Creatine Monohydrate: Meta-Analysis Data on Strength, Hypertrophy, and Safety
Among all sports supplements, creatine monohydrate has the most extensive evidence base: a meta-analysis of 61 RCTs confirms a 5.64 kg increase in squat strength and 1.39 kg gain in lean body mass when combined with resistance training. We break down the mechanism, current data on cognition, and kidney safety.
A meta-analysis of 61 RCTs (JISSN, 2025; n=1457) shows: creatine monohydrate supplementation during resistance training increases lean mass by 1.39 kg (95% CI: 1.07-1.70), squat gains by 5.64 kg. Fat mass is unchanged. Renal safety is confirmed at Grade I; without training there is no gain in muscle mass.
How does creatine work?
During brief, high-intensity efforts - a resistance set, sprint, or jump - muscle cells deplete ATP faster than aerobic resynthesis can keep up. The first reserve is phosphocreatine (PCr): it immediately donates a phosphate group to ADP via the creatine kinase reaction, restoring ATP. The endogenous PCr store provides approximately 8-10 seconds of maximal effort.
According to the ISSN (Kreider et al., Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2017), creatine monohydrate supplementation raises phosphocreatine content in muscles by 20-40% above baseline. The practical implication: 2-4 additional reps at the end of a heavy set - precisely at peak effort, where the greatest mechanical stimulus for hypertrophy accumulates.
Strength and muscle mass: what do meta-analyses show?
The most comprehensive current meta-analysis on strength is Kazeminasab et al. (Nutrients, 2025; 69 RCTs, 1,937 participants, ages 18-80). Key results:
- Bench press: WMD = +1.43 kg (95% CI: 0.53-2.34; p=0.002; 49 studies).
- Squat: WMD = +5.64 kg (95% CI: 3.87-7.40; p<0.001; 17 studies).
- Vertical jump: WMD = +1.48 cm (95% CI: 0.30-2.66; p=0.01; 23 studies).
- Peak anaerobic power (Wingate test): WMD = +47.81 W (95% CI: 15.18-80.45; p=0.004; 12 studies).
An important caveat from this meta-analysis: in participants over 50 years old, no significant strength gains were detected, indicating an age-dependent nature of the effects.
For lean body mass, Ashtary-Larky et al. (JISSN, 2025; 61 RCTs, 1,457 participants; studies from 1997-2024) showed: lean mass +1.39 kg (95% CI: 1.07-1.70; p<0.001), total body mass +0.89 kg, fat mass - non-significant gain (+0.15 kg). GRADE evidence quality - high. The effect was reproduced in both untrained individuals (+1.23 kg) and experienced athletes (+1.82 kg).
Delpino et al. (Nutrition, 2022; 35 RCTs, 1,192 participants) clarify: when combined with resistance training, lean mass +1.10 kg (95% CI: 0.56-1.65); without training - no significant gain. The supplement amplifies the training stimulus, not replaces it.
Does creatine affect cognitive function?
Xu et al. (Frontiers in Nutrition, 2024; 16 RCTs, 492 participants, ages 20.8-76.4) conducted the first comprehensive meta-analysis of cognitive effects. Results by domain:
- Memory: SMD = 0.31 (95% CI: 0.18-0.44; I²=21%; p<0.00001) - GRADE confidence moderate. This is the most robust cognitive finding.
- Overall cognitive score: SMD = 0.34 (95% CI: -0.20 to 0.88; p=0.22) - not statistically significant.
- Executive function: SMD = 0.32 (95% CI: -0.08 to 0.71) - not significant.
- Reaction speed and information processing: significant improvement only in specific subgroups (ages 18-60, presence of disease) - confidence low.
Conclusion: the memory effect is real and moderately reliable; overall cognitive performance cannot be confirmed from existing data. Interpret with caution.
Safety: kidney data
Concerns about nephrotoxicity are widespread in public discussions but are not supported by peer-reviewed literature.
The meta-analysis by Naeini et al. (BMC Nephrology, 2025; 12 studies, 177 participants in the supplementation group): serum creatinine rose by +0.07 umol/L (95% CI: 0.01-0.12; p=0.03) - statistically significant but clinically negligible. The mechanism is clear: exogenous creatine increases its turnover to creatinine; the rise in serum concentration is a consequence of substrate metabolism, not a sign of kidney damage. The authors conclude: "Creatine supplements are safe and do not cause kidney disease."
Longobardi et al. (Frontiers in Nutrition, 2025) examined safety data at doses of 1-80 g/day for durations ranging from 5 days to 60 months and assigned renal safety a level of evidence of Grade I (high) in healthy individuals. Exception: clinical monitoring is necessary with pre-existing kidney pathology.
How to take it: two equivalent protocols
The 2017 ISSN position statement describes two regimens with identical final muscle saturation:
- Loading protocol: 20 g/day split across doses (4 x 5 g per day) for 5-7 days, then 3-5 g/day. Muscles saturate in approximately one week.
- Gradual protocol: 3 g/day without a loading phase. Saturation is reached in approximately 28 days. Final phosphocreatine level is identical to the loading approach.
The loading protocol is justified when rapid effect is needed by a specific date. In all other cases, both approaches are equivalent. The only reproducible side effect is an initial body weight gain (~0.5-1.0 kg) due to water retention in muscle; gastrointestinal discomfort is minimal when a single dose does not exceed 5 g (ISSN, 2017).
- Start with 3-5 g/day of monohydrate. The loading phase accelerates saturation but the final effect does not exceed the gradual protocol. Loading is justified when competition is weeks away.
- Without resistance training, there is no point. Lean mass gains are only reproducible when combined with resistance training (Delpino 2022). The supplement is a stimulus amplifier, not a substitute for exercise.
- Monohydrate is the only form with a reliable evidence base. None of the "improved" forms (buffered, ethyl ester) has shown superiority over monohydrate in direct comparative studies (ISSN 2017).
- Kidney markers in healthy people remain normal. The rise in serum creatinine during supplementation is a metabolic artifact, not pathology. With kidney disease - only under medical supervision.
- The memory effect is real but modest. SMD=0.31 - an improvement that is statistically significant but small in absolute terms. No dramatic cognitive boost should be expected.
Frequently asked questions
Sources
- Kreider R.B. et al. "International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine". Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2017;14:18. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5469049
- Ashtary-Larky D. et al. "Creatine supplementation and resistance training: a comparison between novice and experienced lifters ā a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis". Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2025. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12777911
- Kazeminasab F. et al. "The Effects of Creatine Supplementation on Upper- and Lower-Body Strength and Power: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". Nutrients. 2025;17(17):2748. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12430374
- Delpino F.M., Forbes S.C. et al. "Influence of age, sex, and type of exercise on the efficacy of creatine supplementation on lean body mass". Nutrition. 2022;103-104:111791. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35679827
- Xu C., Bi S., Zhang W., Luo L. "The effects of creatine supplementation on cognitive function in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Frontiers in Nutrition. 2024;11:1424972. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11275561
- Naeini F. et al. "Effect of creatine supplementation on kidney function: a systematic review and meta-analysis". BMC Nephrology. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-025-04558-6. link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12882-025-04558-6
- Longobardi I., Solis M.Y., Roschel H., Gualano B. "A short review of the most common safety concerns regarding creatine ingestion". Frontiers in Nutrition. 2025. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12702719