← All articles
Biohacking

Creatine Monohydrate: Meta-Analysis Data on Strength, Hypertrophy, and Safety

Among all sports supplements, creatine monohydrate has the most extensive evidence base: a meta-analysis of 61 RCTs confirms a 5.64 kg increase in squat strength and 1.39 kg gain in lean body mass when combined with resistance training. We break down the mechanism, current data on cognition, and kidney safety.

6 min readBiohacking29.09.2026
Quick answer

A meta-analysis of 61 RCTs (JISSN, 2025; n=1457) shows: creatine monohydrate supplementation during resistance training increases lean mass by 1.39 kg (95% CI: 1.07-1.70), squat gains by 5.64 kg. Fat mass is unchanged. Renal safety is confirmed at Grade I; without training there is no gain in muscle mass.

How does creatine work?

During brief, high-intensity efforts - a resistance set, sprint, or jump - muscle cells deplete ATP faster than aerobic resynthesis can keep up. The first reserve is phosphocreatine (PCr): it immediately donates a phosphate group to ADP via the creatine kinase reaction, restoring ATP. The endogenous PCr store provides approximately 8-10 seconds of maximal effort.

According to the ISSN (Kreider et al., Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2017), creatine monohydrate supplementation raises phosphocreatine content in muscles by 20-40% above baseline. The practical implication: 2-4 additional reps at the end of a heavy set - precisely at peak effort, where the greatest mechanical stimulus for hypertrophy accumulates.

Strength and muscle mass: what do meta-analyses show?

The most comprehensive current meta-analysis on strength is Kazeminasab et al. (Nutrients, 2025; 69 RCTs, 1,937 participants, ages 18-80). Key results:

  • Bench press: WMD = +1.43 kg (95% CI: 0.53-2.34; p=0.002; 49 studies).
  • Squat: WMD = +5.64 kg (95% CI: 3.87-7.40; p<0.001; 17 studies).
  • Vertical jump: WMD = +1.48 cm (95% CI: 0.30-2.66; p=0.01; 23 studies).
  • Peak anaerobic power (Wingate test): WMD = +47.81 W (95% CI: 15.18-80.45; p=0.004; 12 studies).

An important caveat from this meta-analysis: in participants over 50 years old, no significant strength gains were detected, indicating an age-dependent nature of the effects.

For lean body mass, Ashtary-Larky et al. (JISSN, 2025; 61 RCTs, 1,457 participants; studies from 1997-2024) showed: lean mass +1.39 kg (95% CI: 1.07-1.70; p<0.001), total body mass +0.89 kg, fat mass - non-significant gain (+0.15 kg). GRADE evidence quality - high. The effect was reproduced in both untrained individuals (+1.23 kg) and experienced athletes (+1.82 kg).

Delpino et al. (Nutrition, 2022; 35 RCTs, 1,192 participants) clarify: when combined with resistance training, lean mass +1.10 kg (95% CI: 0.56-1.65); without training - no significant gain. The supplement amplifies the training stimulus, not replaces it.

61 RCTs, 1,457 participants: +1.39 kg lean mass during resistance training with creatine. Fat mass - no significant change. GRADE evidence quality: high.

Does creatine affect cognitive function?

Xu et al. (Frontiers in Nutrition, 2024; 16 RCTs, 492 participants, ages 20.8-76.4) conducted the first comprehensive meta-analysis of cognitive effects. Results by domain:

  • Memory: SMD = 0.31 (95% CI: 0.18-0.44; I²=21%; p<0.00001) - GRADE confidence moderate. This is the most robust cognitive finding.
  • Overall cognitive score: SMD = 0.34 (95% CI: -0.20 to 0.88; p=0.22) - not statistically significant.
  • Executive function: SMD = 0.32 (95% CI: -0.08 to 0.71) - not significant.
  • Reaction speed and information processing: significant improvement only in specific subgroups (ages 18-60, presence of disease) - confidence low.

Conclusion: the memory effect is real and moderately reliable; overall cognitive performance cannot be confirmed from existing data. Interpret with caution.

Safety: kidney data

Concerns about nephrotoxicity are widespread in public discussions but are not supported by peer-reviewed literature.

The meta-analysis by Naeini et al. (BMC Nephrology, 2025; 12 studies, 177 participants in the supplementation group): serum creatinine rose by +0.07 umol/L (95% CI: 0.01-0.12; p=0.03) - statistically significant but clinically negligible. The mechanism is clear: exogenous creatine increases its turnover to creatinine; the rise in serum concentration is a consequence of substrate metabolism, not a sign of kidney damage. The authors conclude: "Creatine supplements are safe and do not cause kidney disease."

Longobardi et al. (Frontiers in Nutrition, 2025) examined safety data at doses of 1-80 g/day for durations ranging from 5 days to 60 months and assigned renal safety a level of evidence of Grade I (high) in healthy individuals. Exception: clinical monitoring is necessary with pre-existing kidney pathology.

How to take it: two equivalent protocols

The 2017 ISSN position statement describes two regimens with identical final muscle saturation:

  • Loading protocol: 20 g/day split across doses (4 x 5 g per day) for 5-7 days, then 3-5 g/day. Muscles saturate in approximately one week.
  • Gradual protocol: 3 g/day without a loading phase. Saturation is reached in approximately 28 days. Final phosphocreatine level is identical to the loading approach.

The loading protocol is justified when rapid effect is needed by a specific date. In all other cases, both approaches are equivalent. The only reproducible side effect is an initial body weight gain (~0.5-1.0 kg) due to water retention in muscle; gastrointestinal discomfort is minimal when a single dose does not exceed 5 g (ISSN, 2017).

What this means in practice
  • Start with 3-5 g/day of monohydrate. The loading phase accelerates saturation but the final effect does not exceed the gradual protocol. Loading is justified when competition is weeks away.
  • Without resistance training, there is no point. Lean mass gains are only reproducible when combined with resistance training (Delpino 2022). The supplement is a stimulus amplifier, not a substitute for exercise.
  • Monohydrate is the only form with a reliable evidence base. None of the "improved" forms (buffered, ethyl ester) has shown superiority over monohydrate in direct comparative studies (ISSN 2017).
  • Kidney markers in healthy people remain normal. The rise in serum creatinine during supplementation is a metabolic artifact, not pathology. With kidney disease - only under medical supervision.
  • The memory effect is real but modest. SMD=0.31 - an improvement that is statistically significant but small in absolute terms. No dramatic cognitive boost should be expected.

Frequently asked questions

Is a loading phase necessary, or is a maintenance dose sufficient?
Both protocols achieve the same final phosphocreatine saturation in muscles. The loading phase (20 g/day x 5-7 days) accelerates saturation to approximately 1 week, the maintenance dose (3 g/day x 28 days) takes about 4 weeks (ISSN; Kreider et al., JISSN, 2017). If no competition is imminent, you can start directly at 3-5 g/day.
Does creatine work without resistance training?
For lean body mass - no. Delpino et al. (Nutrition, 2022; 35 RCTs, 1192 participants) found no lean mass gain when taken without exercise. Strength gains are also minimal. The supplement amplifies the training stimulus, not replaces it.
Is creatine harmful to the kidneys?
The meta-analysis by Naeini et al. (BMC Nephrology, 2025; 12 studies) found a clinically insignificant rise in serum creatinine (+0.07 umol/L) - a consequence of substrate metabolism, not a sign of kidney damage. Longobardi et al. (Front Nutr, 2025): Grade I safety in healthy individuals. With kidney disease - only under medical supervision.
What is the level of evidence for memory effects?
Xu et al. (Front Nutr, 2024; 16 RCTs, 492 participants): memory improvement SMD=0.31 - GRADE confidence moderate. The overall composite cognitive score is not statistically significant. Effects on attention and processing speed are shown only in subgroups - confidence low.

Sources

  1. Kreider R.B. et al. "International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine". Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2017;14:18. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5469049
  2. Ashtary-Larky D. et al. "Creatine supplementation and resistance training: a comparison between novice and experienced lifters — a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis". Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2025. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12777911
  3. Kazeminasab F. et al. "The Effects of Creatine Supplementation on Upper- and Lower-Body Strength and Power: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". Nutrients. 2025;17(17):2748. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12430374
  4. Delpino F.M., Forbes S.C. et al. "Influence of age, sex, and type of exercise on the efficacy of creatine supplementation on lean body mass". Nutrition. 2022;103-104:111791. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35679827
  5. Xu C., Bi S., Zhang W., Luo L. "The effects of creatine supplementation on cognitive function in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Frontiers in Nutrition. 2024;11:1424972. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11275561
  6. Naeini F. et al. "Effect of creatine supplementation on kidney function: a systematic review and meta-analysis". BMC Nephrology. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-025-04558-6. link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12882-025-04558-6
  7. Longobardi I., Solis M.Y., Roschel H., Gualano B. "A short review of the most common safety concerns regarding creatine ingestion". Frontiers in Nutrition. 2025. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12702719
This material is for educational purposes and does not constitute medical advice.

Build your body on data, not hype

Anvil builds your program around your metrics — load, nutrition, and recovery in one system.

Open in Telegram