Exercise and the Brain: What BDNF Does to Neurons
BDNF is a protein the brain produces in response to physical activity: it triggers the growth of new neurons and strengthens synaptic connections. A meta-analysis of 35 RCTs (2025) recorded a significant rise in its levels among those who exercised; one year of aerobic training increases hippocampal volume by ~2%, reversing up to two years of age-related brain atrophy.
Exercise raises BDNF — a neurotrophic factor that stimulates neuron growth. A meta-analysis of 35 RCTs (Experimental Gerontology, 2025) recorded a pooled effect of SMD = 0.56. One year of aerobic training increases hippocampal volume by ~2%, which corresponds to reversing approximately two years of cognitive aging.
For a long time it was thought that neurons were cells that could not be regrown. This turned out to be wrong. The nervous system retains neuroplasticity throughout life, and physical activity is one of its most powerful activators. The key mediator of this process is the protein BDNF.
What BDNF Is and What It Does in the Brain
BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor) is a protein from the neurotrophin family. It supports the survival of existing neurons, stimulates the formation of new ones in the hippocampus (neurogenesis), and enhances synaptic plasticity — the ability of neurons to change the strength of their connections with one another. It is precisely through synaptic plasticity that memories are formed, consolidated, and updated.
The hippocampus — a structure critical for spatial navigation and declarative memory — is especially rich in BDNF receptors. With age its volume gradually decreases: in most people this process begins after 40 and accelerates with a sedentary lifestyle. Lower blood BDNF levels are associated with cognitive decline and an increased risk of neurodegenerative disease.
How Exercise Changes BDNF Levels: Data from 35 RCTs
The systematic review and meta-analysis by Gholami, Mesrabadi, Iranpour, and Donyaei (Experimental Gerontology, 2025) pooled 35 randomized controlled trials in older adults. The result: exercise reliably raises resting BDNF levels — pooled effect SMD = 0.56 (95% CI: 0.28–0.85), corresponding to a moderate evidence-based effect size.
Among modalities, resistance training showed the greatest increase (SMD = 0.76), followed by combined (aerobic + resistance) programs (SMD = 0.55) and aerobic training alone (SMD = 0.48). Moderate-to-high intensity yielded an effect of SMD = 0.83 — higher than moderate intensity alone. A frequency of 3–4 sessions per week proved more effective than 1–2 per week.
Aerobic Training Increases Hippocampal Volume: RCT Evidence
The most-cited direct evidence is the randomized controlled trial by Erickson et al. (PNAS, 2011). 120 older adults were randomly assigned to an aerobic training group (walking three times per week for 12 months, with load progressively increasing to 40 minutes) or a stretching group. MRI before and after: in the aerobic group, hippocampal volume grew by 2.12% (left) and 1.97% (right). In the stretching group, volume continued to decline. The authors calculated that the gain corresponded to reversing approximately two years of age-related hippocampal atrophy.
It is important to understand: this is an observed association within a single RCT, not a universal effect across all ages and populations. Nevertheless, it is a direct RCT with MRI measurements — not a questionnaire — and the effect has been reproduced in subsequent meta-analyses of aerobic interventions in older adults.
Why Resistance Training Unexpectedly Takes the Lead
In popular thinking, "exercise for the brain" means aerobic activity: running, cycling, swimming. The data from Gholami et al. (2025) challenge this assumption: resistance training produced the greatest BDNF increase of all modalities (SMD = 0.76 versus 0.48 for aerobic). The mechanism is likely linked to neuromuscular system engagement and other biochemical cascades (IGF-1, irisin) that additionally stimulate the neurotrophic response. The data were obtained in older adults; extrapolation to other age groups warrants caution, but the trend is consistent.
The Regimen That Works
According to the meta-analysis, the most effective interventions shared three common parameters: duration of at least 12 weeks, moderate-to-high intensity (not merely moderate), and a frequency of 3–4 sessions per week. None of these thresholds looks unattainable — this is the normal routine of a regularly training person, not the protocol of an elite athlete.
An additional nuance: an acute BDNF spike occurs immediately after each workout, but a sustained elevation of the resting baseline level requires regular multi-week training. One intense month followed by a long break will not produce the same adaptation as a consistent routine.
- Do not limit yourself to aerobics for brain health: resistance training produced the greatest BDNF increase of all modalities in the 2025 meta-analysis — add at least 2 resistance sessions per week.
- The horizon is at least 12 weeks: that is the duration covered by the majority of effective interventions; rapid neuroplastic remodeling does not happen.
- Keep intensity moderate-to-high: in the meta-analysis this range yielded SMD = 0.83, outperforming pure moderate-intensity training.
- One year of regular aerobic training can increase hippocampal volume by ~2% — a measurable structural change, not a metaphor.
Frequently Asked Questions
Sources
- Gholami F, Mesrabadi J, Iranpour M, Donyaei A. «Exercise training alters resting brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentration in older adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials». Experimental Gerontology, 2025. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39674562
- Süleymanoğulları M et al. «Effects of Regular Exercise on Peripheral Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Neurological and Non-Neurological Populations: A Meta-Analysis with Meta-Regression». Brain Sciences, 2025. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12839404
- Erickson KI, Voss MW, Prakash RS et al. «Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory». Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011; 108(7): 3017–3022. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21282661